OIL ECONOMY GASOLINE vs. GASEOUS FUELS Back
For a number of years we have been occasionally faced with an oil economy problem in a propane or other gaseous fuel engine. There have been many discussions directed at ring types: "you can't use chrome", or "you can't use moly"; plain compression rings are all that will work, etc. The popular theory was that dry fuel does not have "fuel wash" as does gasoline, so the rings will not "seat".

A common field fix that has evolved from this is the use of Bon Ami, an abrasive cleaning agent. It is either induced through the carburetor or made into a slurry and spread on the O.D. face of the piston ring. This is not a recommended practice of Hastings Manufacturing Company. It is not recommended by any other internal engine parts manufacturer we're aware of.

The introduction of any abrasive into an engine ends up with the abrasive in the engine's lube oil and creates uncontrollable, greatly accelerated wear on every surface of the engine.

 

Hastings Manufacturing Company conducted seven (7) dynamometer tests to determine oil economy trends of gasoline versus gaseous fuels. The parameters of the tests were:

1) Cylinders deglazed with a flex-hone and thoroughly cleaned between tests.

2) Good engine assembly procedures, as outlined in "Service Tips for the Automotive Mechanic" were utilized.

3) Tests 5, 6, and 7 used moly, chrome, and plain compression rings, respectively. The test data shows all ring types gave acceptable levels of oil economy.

The same levels of oil economy were attained simply by following good, clean shop practices.

(P59)